“There is no remembrance of men of old, and even those who are yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow.”In past years revisionist historians have been rewriting the worldview of Christians who have made some of the major discoveries in biology and medicine. It appears that postmodern revisionists are rewriting history to support their agenda of a more “secular” explanation to science. The Judeo-Christian worldview is not politically correct in most universities. This is true in regard to past scientists such as Louis Pasteur who believed in creation. According to reliable, primary sources such as René Vallery-Radot, Pasteur’s son-in-law, Pasteur’s unique view and application of operational science gave him a significant advantage, benefiting mankind in a number of critical areas.Ecclesiastes 1:11 (NIV)
Shortly after Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, Pasteur began to challenge the idea of spontaneous generation—the foundation of the evolutionary view on the origin of life. Pasteur’s simple, but elegant swan-necked flask experiments not only put to rest the organic life-from-non-life idea, but also set the foundation for the law of biogenesis: life only comes from life. The genesis of germs in hospital patients were the result of microbes having parents, not a result of spontaneous generation. This revolutionary idea would have application in many areas of medicine. It forms the basis of sterilization, asepsis in surgery, and the germ theory of disease.
Pasteur had the uncanny ability to combine theoretical, operational, and applied science—the mark of a truly gifted scientist. Pasteur understood the variability of microbes and how he could apply this principle in vaccine preparation. For example, he noticed that Bacillus anthracis cultures sometimes lose their pathogenic ability when heated, and then retain this modified, nonvirulent, or “attenuated” trait through many generations. He applied this concept to vaccinate dozens of sheep that would have otherwise died at a critical time in France. His understanding of this natural variation was also successfully applied in developing vaccines for chicken cholera and rabies.
Although his scientific pronouncements were sometimes abrasive to his fellow scientists, he remained firm in his convictions, borne from painstaking research. Pasteur had a strong religious and humanitarian spirit. He firmly believed in God, as the Creator of all living things. From his knowledge of the Gospels, he wanted to benefit mankind by having his ideas used to “heal the sick.” Ref. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/louis-pasteurs-views
What do you think of Louis Pastuer? Does this article and the movie agree? What is historical revisionism? How do worldviews affect moviemaking? What scientist would you like to see a movie about?
Andrew Bartlett · 710 weeks ago
The BC Team
Andrew Bartlett · 710 weeks ago
BCTeam 15p · 710 weeks ago
Alexandra Camacho · 710 weeks ago
What is most interesting about his film is that Pasteur was portrayed. To an outsider watching this film the dramatic irony, knowing he will succeed, despite the opposition all contrary to his beliefs and predictions, this section of the film had me on my toes!
A straightforward comment that Mr. Pasture made during the film I admired fully, and will take it with me from now on. (Simplistic, and brief, but something that seems to be overlooked and forgotten.) "Benefits of science are not for science Mary, they're for humanity." He is completely right. This selflessness that is illustrated by him in the film is how I, with great amount of 'hope', all scientists feel. They are important. The people yes, themselves have value, but to understand what they are doing is greater than themselves is something to be revered.
Wether it's a coincidence or not, the pure fact that Pasteur's mindset came from one of a belief in creation, tells a lot about where his logic in other sciences will lay. (To say however, or lump Christianity with science was not intended, just for this articles demonstrations sake) However, the article, in my own view, did a agreeable job in coinciding with the film, and vice vera.
As the article stated, "Pasteur had the uncanny ability to combine theoretical, operational, and applied science—the mark of a truly gifted scientist." Among the group of greats, I think one who should have his story told more is probably one of the greatest scientific minds that ever existed. Eratosthenes of Cyrene (276 - 195 BC). Several hundred years before the birth of Christ he determined that the earth was spherical, and was able to calculate the circumference of the earth within about 20% of its actual value. That is an achievement well beyond his time, and dangerous beyond doubt to believe! To see a movie portraying his find would be both compelling and interesting!
BCTeam 15p · 710 weeks ago
If this is the case, try refreshing the page. You might need to do this more than once. At first it might come up with the Blogger commenting, so click refresh again to get the "Intense Debate" commenting window.
Thanks!
The BC Team
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
by: J. Aaron Guy
Well in a lot of ways. The fact that everyone has an opinion and has an idea of how things are to go and what should happen is a major factor. Everyone wants to have control over something no matter what it is. (myself included) So the fact that my life and my fate rest in a all knowing all powerful God is scary to most, which in turn makes them want to write their own story...to make their own "god". Many movies have been made and changed because one person thought it would go better this way or that way.
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
When directors leave God out of the picture they put their lives...their fates, into their own hands. Because the world tells you, "You can be the master of your own life when in reality God is in control. Even when you think he's not.
Dr Bartlett · 710 weeks ago
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
I wasnt makeing a statement about all directors just the general outlook on movies and directors today thats all =]
J. Aaron Guy · 710 weeks ago
Daniel Guy · 710 weeks ago
Bailey Hand · 709 weeks ago
Bailey Hand · 709 weeks ago
Daniel Guy · 709 weeks ago
Bailey Hand · 709 weeks ago
Dr Bartlett · 709 weeks ago
Daniel Guy · 709 weeks ago